Being critical
As an academic writer, you are expected to be critical of the sources that you use. This essentially means questioning what you read and not necessarily agreeing with it just because the information has been published. Being critical also means looking for reasons why we should not just accept something as being correct or true. This can require you to identify problems with a writer’s arguments or methods, or perhaps to refer to other people’s criticisms of these. Constructive criticism goes beyond this by suggesting ways in which a piece of research or writing could be improved … being against is not enough. We also need to develop habits of constructive thinking.
Introductory phrases
Much of the criticism that X has attracted relates to …
Critics question the ability of the X theory to provide …
Many aspects of this interpretation have been questioned.
Non-government agencies are also very critical of the new policies.
Smith’s meta-analysis has been subjected to considerable criticism.
A frequent criticism of much of the research on X concerns a general lack of …
These claims have been strongly contested in recent years by a number of writers.
The X theory has been vigorously challenged in recent years by a number of writers.
More recent arguments against X have been summarised by Smith and Jones (1982).
Many analysts now argue that the strategy of X has not been successful. Jones (2003), for example, …
Highlighting inadequacies of previous studies
Previous studies of X have not dealt with …
Researchers have not treated X in much detail.
Such expositions are unsatisfactory because they …
Most studies in the field of X have only focused on …
Half of the studies evaluated failed to specify whether …
The research to date has tended to focus on X rather than Y.
Most empirical studies of X have relied upon small sample sizes.
However, these studies used non-validated methods to measure …
The vast majority of researchers have not considered the effects of …
The existing accounts fail to resolve the contradiction between X and Y.
Most studies of X have only been carried out in a small number of areas.
However, much of the research up to now has been descriptive in nature.
| Most studies of X | have only focused on … do not address the question of … are unsatisfactory because they … fail to estimate economic rates of … have only investigated the impact of … have not included variables relating to … are limited by weak designs and a failure to address … have only been carried out in a small number of areas. |
Identifying a weakness in a single study or paper
We are not told how …
The study suffers from …
The paper fails to specify …
No attempt has been made to …
The study makes no attempt to …
The article makes no reference to …
The report provides little evidence that …
A major problem with this experiment was that …
No attempt was made to quantify the association between X and Y.
The scope of this research was relatively narrow, being primarily concerned with …
Smith’s study of X is considered to be the most important, but it does suffer from the fact that …
However, these results were based upon data from over 30 years ago and it is unclear whether …
| The study | is limited | in that |
it ignores … it only considers … it fails to provide … it relies solely on … it did not measure … the sample is from … it focuses solely on … it investigates only one … it does not take into account … it did not assess frequency of … the data collected come from … it may be generalisable only to … only 10 participants were included. it does not address the question of … the definition of X did not encompass … it does not clearly distinguish between … it is a post-hoc analysis based on data gathered from … |
| The paper | fails to does not makes no attempt to |
specify … quantify … separate … compare … account for … suggest why … analyse how … ascertain whether … distinguish between … explain the meaning of … provide information on … address the question of … assess the effectiveness of … use a standardised method of … give sufficient consideration to … consider the long term impact of … offer an adequate explanation for … engage with current discourses on … determine the underlying causes of … systematically review all the relevant literature |
Introducing problems and limitations with a theory or argument
The main weakness with this theory is that …
The key problem with this explanation is that …
However, this theory does not fully explain why …
One criticism of much of the literature on X is that …
Critics question the ability of the X theory to provide …
However, there is an inconsistency with this argument.
There are limits to how far the concept of X can be taken.
A serious weakness with this argument, however, is that …
However, such explanations tend to overlook the fact that …
One question that needs to be asked, however, is whether …
One of the main difficulties with this line of reasoning is that …
Smith’s argument relies too heavily on qualitative analysis of …
| The theory is unable to | predict … explain why … fully account for … adequately explain the … explain what happens when … make any useful prediction about … explain the differences observed when … provide a comprehensive explanation for … |
Introducing problems and limitations with a method or practice
The limitation of this approach is that …
A major problem with the X method is that …
One major drawback of this approach is that …
A criticism of this experimental design is that …
The main limitation of this technique, however, is …
Selection bias is another potential concern because …
Perhaps the most serious disadvantage of this method is that …
In recent years, however, this approach has been challenged by …
Non-government agencies are also very critical of the new policies.
All the studies reviewed so far, however, suffer from the fact that …
Critics of laboratory-based experiments contend that such studies …
The disadvantage of this method is its reliance on the availability of …
| Selection bias is another (potential) | risk. concern. problem. limitation. weakness. threat to internal validity. limitation of systematic reviews. |
Criticising an author or an author’s work
Smith seems to ignore …
Smith fails to grasp that …
Smith’s interpretation overlooks …
Smith devotes insufficient attention to …
Smith overlooks a number of important sources.
Smith fails to acknowledge the social aspects of …
However, Smith’s accounts are clearly ideological.
Although Smith has argued that … she neglects to note that …
Many aspects of Smith’s interpretation have been questioned.
Smith’s meta-analysis has been subjected to considerable criticism.
Smith’s arguments for X have been forcefully questioned in recent years.
The most important of these criticisms is that Smith failed to note that …
| Smith The book The paper |
fails to does not makes no attempt to |
specify … quantify … compare … separate … account for … suggest why … analyse how … ascertain whether … distinguish between … explain the meaning of … provide information on … address the question of … assess the effectiveness of … use a standardised method of … give sufficient consideration to … consider the long term impact of … offer an adequate explanation for … engage with current discourses on … determine the underlying causes of … systematically review all the relevant literature. |
| Smith The book The paper |
overlooks fails to acknowledge makes no attempt to consider |
the impact of … the reasons for … the evidence for … the contexts in which … several key aspects of … the variable nature of … other explanations for … the complex nature of … the potential impact of … the social dimension of … the dynamic aspects of … the underlying causes of … demographic factors that … the ethical implications of … the important role played by … the broader implications of how … the unique complexities faced by … the contextual factors that influence … |
Offering constructive suggestions
The study would have been more interesting if it had included …
These studies would have been more useful if they had focused on …
The study would have been more relevant if the researchers had asked …
The questionnaire would have been more useful if it had asked participants about …
The research would have been more relevant if a wider range of X had been explored.
| The study The findings Smith’s paper Her conclusions |
would have been might have been |
more far more much more |
useful original relevant convincing interesting persuasive |
if he/she had … if the author had … |
Evaluating work positively
This article provides a valuable insight into …
Overall, X’s study is a powerful explanation of …
Smith’s conception of X has been credited with …
Smith’s 2015 study is particularly helpful owing to its …
Smith’s research is valuable for our understanding of …
The first major fieldwork project that was started in X was …
In his seminal text, XXXXX, Smith devoted some attention to …
Smith’s account of X provides us with a useful lens through which …
One of the most influential accounts of X comes from Smith (1986) …
Smith’s synthesis remains one of the most comprehensive studies of …
Smith makes an interesting contribution with regard to the impact of …
In a well-designed and robust study, Smith (1998) examined data from …
A good summary of the classification of X has been provided in the work of …
| Smith | offers provides presents |
a useful a detailed an original a thorough an insightful an extensive an interesting a contemporary a comprehensive |
analysis of … |
| Smith’s | seminal landmark influential thoughtful innovative pioneering fascinating informative wide-ranging comprehensive |
study analysis |
provides a valuable insight into … makes a valuable contribution with regard to … remains crucial to our wider understanding of … is of great significance as it marks the first attempt … |